Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Tony Szamboti's 25 Points of Contention with NIST
#1
from 911Blogger (Some of the comments are worth reading.)

Quote:Below is a series of twenty five provable points which clearly demonstrate that the reports produced by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) on the destruction of the World Trade Center (WTC) were unscientific and fraudulent. Therefore NIST itself including its lead authors, Shyam Sunder and John Gross should be investigated.
"We'll know our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the American public believes is false." --William J. Casey, D.C.I

"We will lead every revolution against us."  --Theodore Herzl
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Great New 911 Film - NIST insider speaks out about the obvious lies. Peter Lemkin 0 5,716 14-03-2017, 07:25 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  NIST overlooked NSA's cryptography 'back door' Peter Lemkin 0 4,044 28-11-2014, 08:59 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Tony Szamboti on NIST Lauren Johnson 0 3,499 08-11-2014, 06:36 AM
Last Post: Lauren Johnson
  More BS: an alternative to the NIST fairytale Martin White 4 9,304 04-11-2014, 10:13 AM
Last Post: Martin White
  9/11 Consensus Points Tracy Riddle 3 5,884 11-09-2014, 03:20 PM
Last Post: Dawn Meredith
  Prelude To A Lawsuit Against NIST?! Peter Lemkin 4 6,257 04-03-2014, 03:01 AM
Last Post: Lauren Johnson
  9/11 Free Fall 1/16/14: Tony Szamboti and Gerry B. Lauren Johnson 4 6,172 26-01-2014, 04:40 PM
Last Post: David Guyatt
  The case against the NIST WTC 7 collapse initiation analysis Tony Szamboti 5 5,814 29-11-2013, 04:31 AM
Last Post: Jeffrey Orling
  New Seismic Analysis Further Points to Controlled Demolition.... Peter Lemkin 0 4,448 03-12-2012, 05:21 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  The Eleventh Day by Tony Summers and Robbyn Swan Bill Kelly 14 15,443 24-08-2011, 01:07 PM
Last Post: James Lewis

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)