Was 9/11 the result of a new energy weapon?

[Peter Lemkin]

Dave, there are some other threads on our Forum on Wood. The Hutchinson Effect is real [if sometimes distorted as to what it is and is not] - and he had GREAT troubles with the authorities in Canada - who confiscated all of his equipment from his home. Woods research, IMO, is interesting and provocative, but remains unsupported thus far by most evidence. While not out of the realm of possibility, such powerful beam weaponry is not yet known [it could be a well kept secret] and especially if positioned in Space, hard to imagine where the needed power could come from. It would explain some of the stranger observations, but there are alternatives. I do not dismiss Wood as many 911 researchers do, but keep an open mind on her work - while not lining up behind it, just yet. As I said, there are simpler to achieve ways of doing most of the observed effects. She should, however, not be totally dismissed and she raises several interesting questions that remain unexplained or poorly explained using 'standard' 911 Truth theories. Whether one likes her theories or not, her [expensive] book has just about the best collection of photos of the debris and event as any.