16-07-2009, 06:50 PM
Peter Lemkin Wrote:Paul Rigby Wrote:Peter Lemkin Wrote:I have to agree with CD. This is one of the many [all too many] purposefully invented blind alleys for some of us to get lost in - and seed conflicting theories. No credible evidence exists that this ever happened - only a few glints of smoke and mirrors - all phony.
Pete, Pete...this won't do. Witnesses with no conceivable ulterior motive described, and, in some instances, sought to interest the WC in, shots from within the presidential limo. They did so, in some cases, long after the official orthodoxy had been, after a faltering start, set in stone. Not a single official followed up with the questions that should have issued. None of this testimony was invented; nor was any pattern imposed by those who found it. It's there.
Peter Lemkin Wrote:Jackie and the Connellys would have known, people in the plaza would have known...
They did, Peter, they did. Among them were some of the closest eyewitnesses.
Particularly after the Secret Service washed the presidential limo out...
But which acoustic evidence and which wound patterns? The majority view among the Parkland doctors was, for the head wound, a left temple entrance/right rear exit - exactly as one would expect from a hand gun fired from the driver's seat!
Peter Lemkin Wrote:Besides, you just don't run a covert op with the main event in plain sight anyway.
The assassination of RFK? MLK? Malcolm X? In fact, Pete, the contrary is true. Moreover, the American tradition is close range assassination by hand-gun. There is no precedent within that tradition for assassination by rifle from distance.
Peter Lemkin Wrote:This has been put to sleep so many times, but it keeps walking around....I suggest this one be laid to rest once and for all. On this one, I think there is no there there. This is a planted story - as are so many others.
At the heart of John Fitzgerald Kennedy's murder was a brute simplicity: I urge you to think again!
There are REAL attempts to hide SS complicity in the JFK Assassassination and I'd agree with most who think some [perhaps not all there that day] had some hand - witting or unwitting - in the non-protection of the President. That said, I can't find any evidence that Greer shot JFK nor even had a gun in his hand. Greer may well have been guilty as hell for slowing the car and other things that day...maybe even not moving on until the 'job was done' by those in the sewer/GN and other places - but shooting JFK....I vote no....sorry. Paul, I like you and like your general take on the fate of the Panet in the bloody hands of the worst humans, but on this we have to agree to disagree. I believe this is a psyop to divert. There have been many many others...in fact we have now postively identified about 40 of the 4 gunmen!
I have been overly busy with work so have not read this entire thread, but at this point I am casting my opinion and vote with CD and Peter. I have viewed the Greer- did -it as a psyop for a long time, and this case is filled with them. It's probably the main reason I don't go near the Z alteration argument. We just don't need it to PROVE conspiracy. We need to remain focussed on the big picture: that our invisible government took out our elected president and now forty five years later are still getting away with it.
A fellow I met on face book who I believe has now posted here came up with a great idea: points upon all can agree. (Joseph Green is his name). His article is also posted at Jim DiEugenio's site and I have not looked at it since first reading it some weeks back, but I remember the idea of (a) k.i.s.s. and (b)FINDING points upon which to agree. The conspirators knew well in advance that there would be divisions and arguments and they stacked the deck by adding their own to our mix. If we are ever to get anywhere we must see throught the many traps and find a place upon which to unite. Bickering over nonsense has kept us where we are, now nearly forty five years later. And by nonsence I mean small points like grassy knoll vs. some other place in front, coat bunching vs. fraud by Gerald Ford, the list is endless. This is not trivial pursuit. This is quest to right the historical record and if ever possible find some right in such terrible wrongs.
Dawn