15-07-2009, 05:35 AM
(This post was last modified: 15-07-2009, 07:03 AM by Peter Lemkin.)
Charles Drago Wrote:Paul,
I've asked myself -- as I often do -- "What would George Michael say about all this?" The answer is important, I think, and I want to share it with you in the most heartfelt manner.
Your passion is commendable. So too is your willingness to defy convention and search outside the proverbial box for answers to the most vexing of questions.
Throughout my labors in our common vinyard I attempt to bring both of those qualities to the tasks at hand.
The trick, I think, is to be willing to abandon even those most dearly held assumptions if they are legitimately and definitively challenged.
And the challenges must include those arising from within.
My challenges to your hypothesis in this regard are the products of the best I have to offer. I did not reject it out of hand; rather, I subjected it to the most focused and informed critical analyses of which I'm capable.
Try as I might, I neither can discern credible supporting evidence nor avoid the conclusion that the entire scenario was born of an effort to defeat us.
So ... While I respect your courage, I reject your convictions relating to the argument at hand even as I encourage you to reinforce your willingness to stand proud as a minority of one (so to speak).
Charlie
I have to agree with CD. This is one of the many [all too many] purposefully invented blind alleys for some of us to get lost in - and seed conflicting theories. No credible evidence exists that this ever happened - only a few glints of smoke and mirrors - all phony. Jackie and the Connellys would have known, people in the plaza would have known, the blood splatter patterns to various people and places don't fit this, the acousitic evidence would be different, even altered medical evidence would have to be different than it is, etc. Besides, you just don't run a covert op with the main event in plain sight anyway. This has been put to sleep so many times, but it keeps walking around....I suggest this one be laid to rest once and for all. On this one, I think there is no there there. This is a planted story - as are so many others.
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass

