12-04-2014, 04:59 PM
Dawn Meredith Wrote:Regarding the latent print, most of us know that this was matched to LBJ's hit man Malcolm Mac Wallace in 1998 by Print expert Nathan Darby. My friend and neighbor Nathan passed on in 2006, as did my friend deep cover researcher Jay Harrison (5/25/05) who obtained Wallace's known prints (from the murder of John Kinsner) and the latent, then found the best expert in Austin, Nathan Darby, gave it to him "blind" and he made the match. I know that this is now being disputed but I SAW the match here at a joint birthday I gave for Nathan and myself 10/25/03. Nathan had tried to show me many times before this but I did not really SEE it til that Saturday so I don't care about the new "no match" findings. Richard Bartholomew and I clearly saw it. (As did another expert in Luling who independently made the match but then became too afraid to go public with it.)
Dawn
That news spread like wildfire in 1998, but as I recall it kind of died out after some legitimate researcher who also suspected Wallace in the hit said the fingerprints were not a match (although he surely didn't have Mr. Darby's credentials in fingerprint analysis). I found this online which is purported to show the prints Mr. Darby analyzed:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]5892[/ATTACH]
What bothers me about this, though, is Wallace's obvious ties to LBJ. Whatever Johnson was, he wasn't stupid, and only a fool would send his close friend on an assignment to kill a sitting president. If Mr. Darby's analysis is correct, I'll bet the farm this is planted evidence.