31-03-2014, 04:08 AM
Greg R Parker Wrote:The real bottom line is this: Armstrong never had a clue if tonsils could grow back or and never bothered to try and find out. He made an assumption and ran with it because the assumption suited his thesis.
From Harvey and Lee, page 37:
In 1945 a tonsillectomy was as routine an operation as it is
today. It is performed by anesthetizing the patient, propping the mouth open, depress-
ing the tongue, grasping the tonsils with a tenaculum, and then cutting out the tonsils.
The patient is then allowed to awake naturally from anesthesia. The operation is nearly
100% successful and only in extremely rare cases do tonsils re-appear. If and when ton-
sils do re-appear, they grow only to no more than 10% of their original size--not large
enough to require removal.
Why do you continually and inaccurately attack John Armstrong, and then when whine like a child when supporter's of John's research attack you--by telling you the facts? Why don't you read the book to avoid your embarrassments? Would you like me to create a post that summarizes the many erroneous attacks you have made on John Armstrong here so far that are completely undone by Harvey and Lee?
Jim