27-03-2014, 04:42 AM
Albert Doyle Wrote:Number 2 would have problems. Doctors, I'm sure, are sophisticated enough to distinguish between regrown tonsils and originals. They are professional enough to see there were no surgery marks and therefore no removed tonsils. Being a doctor I think Dr Philben would be smart enough to realize this too and know he couldn't get away with it. Professional doctors would not reach for the easily disproven 'regrown tonsils' excuse as quickly as you do because they would realize it wouldn't work - just as it isn't working for you here. Perhaps you sense that so you prefer number 1.
What bones and muscles do you manipulate to treat tonsils? And what possible reason would Marguerite think whatever manipulation she witnessed was intended for the tonsils? You're on swampy ground at best and fishing. Could you please articulate clearly how a non-present Marguerite came to the conclusion that a treatment she had no means of witnessing was a tonsillectomy? Your scenario requires Marguerite to drop Lee off for a non-specific illness for which she had no consultation with the doctor and then made a completely blind assumption that it was a tonsillectomy based on nothing you can describe. I'm sorry but you're not seriously offering this to adult people? You're not seriously offering this after attacking and ridiculing people for their entries? Is this what a mother would have done with a 5 years old child? Dropped him off and guessed?
Are you joking? You dare offer something like this?
Well said, Albert! This entire thread is INSANE. A mother doesn't know when her young son's throat has been cut open? It takes two weeks to recover from a tonsillectomy, and a far higher percentage of young children had tonsillectomies sixty years ago than do now. Mothers knew more about the procedure then. This is Crazy Town!