01-02-2014, 05:22 PM
Albert Doyle Wrote:I think James is arguing from his own conspiracy world. One where somehow Dallek is a good JFK author. Meanwhile I don't see where I've committed the wrong James seems anxious to credit me with. Anyhow, the moderators don't want squabbles so I think people have seen enough.
Horne's Bethesda evidence shows reason for a public action in the Kennedy case. Drago and Salandria would probably say squabbling over alteration details is only prolonging the question.
There is nothing wrong with squabbles - just that there is no need to insult a person for being incorrect about something or having a different opinion. We need squabbles to hash out the facts...