02-11-2008, 05:09 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-11-2008, 05:23 PM by David Guyatt.)
LaRouche's publications and essays are far too often lacking in citations that show where their evidence was derived from. This always leaves a bad taste in my mouth because there is no need to leave out this important information that allows other researchers to evidence the accuracy of their essays.
Meanwhile Linda, I have answered my own question about the Queen dun it! attitude. It's in that large Synarchy dump I sent you awhile back. According to the LaRouche people the Queen and her Duke-y are the top dogs of the synarchy bunch.
They present absolutely no evidence in support of this statement...
Then we must remember that Queenie and Duke-y were the big bad wolf deacdes ago, long before LaRouche began writing about Synarchy which is, in any event, a rather French manifestation all the way back to its originator Marquis Alexandre Saint-Yves d'Alveydre
Meanwhile Linda, I have answered my own question about the Queen dun it! attitude. It's in that large Synarchy dump I sent you awhile back. According to the LaRouche people the Queen and her Duke-y are the top dogs of the synarchy bunch.
They present absolutely no evidence in support of this statement...
Then we must remember that Queenie and Duke-y were the big bad wolf deacdes ago, long before LaRouche began writing about Synarchy which is, in any event, a rather French manifestation all the way back to its originator Marquis Alexandre Saint-Yves d'Alveydre
The shadow is a moral problem that challenges the whole ego-personality, for no one can become conscious of the shadow without considerable moral effort. To become conscious of it involves recognizing the dark aspects of the personality as present and real. This act is the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge.
Carl Jung - Aion (1951). CW 9, Part II: P.14