25-11-2013, 04:54 AM
I'm already getting the sense that there is some doubt
regarding as to what can be agreed upon, that we all, in fact,
agree upon.
Here's one from Peter: "The Z film was tampered with to confirm more to the official fairy tale."
I know I still reserve judgement on this, and have read comments from many that makes it
clear not all pro-conspiracy folk agree on this.
While I think it's probable that the Z film was altered, I see most things as probabilities, rather than strictly
either/or. Binary thinking in matters such as JFK's murder creates too many problems. This subject matter is
what writer Robert Anton Wilson would have referred to as "Chapel Perilous".
And Peter, I have read countless quality titles, and many more of debatable quality on the subject. I began
studying the JFK hit seriously in 2003 and only recently let up. I had a collection of over two hundred titles
I recently sold. I checked out most everything the Ga. state library system had available, except for obvious
garbage such as Posner, Bugliosi etc.
regarding as to what can be agreed upon, that we all, in fact,
agree upon.
Here's one from Peter: "The Z film was tampered with to confirm more to the official fairy tale."
I know I still reserve judgement on this, and have read comments from many that makes it
clear not all pro-conspiracy folk agree on this.
While I think it's probable that the Z film was altered, I see most things as probabilities, rather than strictly
either/or. Binary thinking in matters such as JFK's murder creates too many problems. This subject matter is
what writer Robert Anton Wilson would have referred to as "Chapel Perilous".
And Peter, I have read countless quality titles, and many more of debatable quality on the subject. I began
studying the JFK hit seriously in 2003 and only recently let up. I had a collection of over two hundred titles
I recently sold. I checked out most everything the Ga. state library system had available, except for obvious
garbage such as Posner, Bugliosi etc.