01-09-2013, 09:00 AM
Is the administration setting fires, putting them out, or is it their pants which are on fire
And, what difference does it make
Did we not have this debate ten years ago
Why did we go to Iraq--was it for an oil pipeline, to take out some Saudi trash, to ease pressure on Iran--
--for in 2004 the CFR paper "Iran: Time for a New Approach" was authored by Brzezinski and Gates, supposedly from different ideological camps
Now comes the teleprompter orator with the same slam-dunk WMD chest-beating
Buzzwords in the lottery of political rhetoric are climbdown, blowback, coalition of the won't-ing
Did Kerry realize the security state he serves killed the president who opposed the war he protested
Can't these people get off the treadmill
Assad could be taken out with a .50 cal. from miles away--or in any number of methods--the so-righteous Putin would just say here's some Polonium--bon appetit
Benghazi was CIA using Qatari resources to arm Muslim Brotherhood which made Turkey's Erdogan happy but some of the children very angry
Where are the righteous forces
Not in the White House or Congress if all they can do is waste the money which could feed Africa this week on a HE catharsis
Sibel Edmonds said transcend the partisan in favor of a deeper investigation
It would seem we need to transcend all the politicians in favor of making the region a demilitarized zone and providing the humanitarian aid necessary
The guy who couldn't watch all of the OBL raid but had to go play cards with Reggie Love is trying to finesse a situation with a missile salvo and a wave from the door of Marine One
It's deja vu Mission Accomplished all over again
And as for Egypt, what can he do--Saudi says don't re-install Morsi, but Qatari and Turkey demand it, and of course Hillary-Huma are all in
And the article says the supposed other side of Gore Vidal's one party with two right wings is worried about defense budgets
Isn't it more likely that the decision is clouded by Saudi control of USG and a generalized sub rosa struggle for the oil regardless of team colors
Yet the trappings are always noble while the real stakes stack profit over people in war after war
Jim, it's a good open letter to the White House and Congress: Ask the People for permission--and they're closing your account
Of course, some cynics would say any blowback would facilitate martial law and further engorge the security state like a blood-sucking tick
[ATTACH=CONFIG]5201[/ATTACH]
And, what difference does it make
Did we not have this debate ten years ago
Why did we go to Iraq--was it for an oil pipeline, to take out some Saudi trash, to ease pressure on Iran--
--for in 2004 the CFR paper "Iran: Time for a New Approach" was authored by Brzezinski and Gates, supposedly from different ideological camps
Now comes the teleprompter orator with the same slam-dunk WMD chest-beating
Buzzwords in the lottery of political rhetoric are climbdown, blowback, coalition of the won't-ing
Did Kerry realize the security state he serves killed the president who opposed the war he protested
Can't these people get off the treadmill
Assad could be taken out with a .50 cal. from miles away--or in any number of methods--the so-righteous Putin would just say here's some Polonium--bon appetit
Benghazi was CIA using Qatari resources to arm Muslim Brotherhood which made Turkey's Erdogan happy but some of the children very angry
Where are the righteous forces
Not in the White House or Congress if all they can do is waste the money which could feed Africa this week on a HE catharsis
Sibel Edmonds said transcend the partisan in favor of a deeper investigation
It would seem we need to transcend all the politicians in favor of making the region a demilitarized zone and providing the humanitarian aid necessary
The guy who couldn't watch all of the OBL raid but had to go play cards with Reggie Love is trying to finesse a situation with a missile salvo and a wave from the door of Marine One
It's deja vu Mission Accomplished all over again
And as for Egypt, what can he do--Saudi says don't re-install Morsi, but Qatari and Turkey demand it, and of course Hillary-Huma are all in
And the article says the supposed other side of Gore Vidal's one party with two right wings is worried about defense budgets
Isn't it more likely that the decision is clouded by Saudi control of USG and a generalized sub rosa struggle for the oil regardless of team colors
Yet the trappings are always noble while the real stakes stack profit over people in war after war
Jim, it's a good open letter to the White House and Congress: Ask the People for permission--and they're closing your account
Of course, some cynics would say any blowback would facilitate martial law and further engorge the security state like a blood-sucking tick
[ATTACH=CONFIG]5201[/ATTACH]