What can we do now to make a difference?

[Charles Drago]

The issue I see plaguing the conspiracy community is the lack of unity. I am new to this board, but also not new to the JFK assassination or large world events, but I received a welcome as rude as any I have received on ACJ and other boards that are loaded with WC defenders. The reason being is this--many conspiracy minded folks fall into the same trap the WC defenders do--they are hooked to a theory and won't consider anything that does NOT match-up with that conclusion.

No. You came here spouting an utterly discredited "theory" more suited to science fiction than to deep political analysis.

Bad science fiction.

To wit:

I simply said some researchers have said JFK suffered the same three wounds Mason Hiram Abif did and you would think I had said the WC got it right!

Nonsense! You simply said nothing! Rather, you expressed your science fiction as a statement of fact. Then, when Jan and I exposed you and your lame tactics, you turned tail and ran while bleating, "All I was attempting to do was show the work others have done over the years."

Let's turn back our clocks to yesteryear -- August 9 of this year to be exact, when the following was posted on

https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/new...ly&p=73677

Kennedy was hit in the throat, back and head a la Hiram Abif. These wounds are depicted and recreated by new initiates every year into the world of Masonry. He was killed by three "unworthy" craftsmen and some relate the "three hobos" to this part of the Abif story in the JFK murder.

Sorry - but this is garbage and discredits legitimate research into this area of the assassination.

The Mechanics, the Shooters, were tasked with killing Kennedy.

There is no way the Shooters were tasked with hitting Kennedy in the throat, back and head to demonstrate masonic symbolism.

I presented an overview of some of the things that have been cited for years in this regard.

Cited by whom? Fools, charlatans, and disinformation agents, to be sure.

If you don't believe them that is fine, but to discredit it out of hand is not something I am not going to do.

Nothing was discredited "out of hand." Rather, what you wrote was recognized as garbage by individuals who have spent decades in open-minded study of the JFK case and who, in many instances, are recognized internationally for their expertise and published research.

The FACT Masons were on the WC and part of the investigation is simply part of the record.

As were agnostics, Irishmen, fishermen, and wine enthusiasts.

I also did not state this as a fact ...

Sunsteinian bullshit!

You wrote the following, which in word choice and tone is nothing other than a [B]statement of fact:

"Kennedy was hit in the throat, back and head a la Hiram Abif. These wounds are depicted and recreated by new initiates every year into the world of Masonry. He was killed by three "unworthy" craftsmen and some relate the "three hobos" to this part of the Abif story in the JFK murder."

This is a classic maneuver of the agent provocateur -- one we have seen all too often.

In my expert and widely respected opinion as protected by the U.S. Constitution, you have come to DPF on a mission to disrupt, disinform, demonize, and further prep the battlefield in advance of pending 50th anniversary attacks on those who know and proselytize the truth of conspiracy in the assassination of John Fitzgerald Kennedy.[/B]

I stand by this opinion today.

I'll close with Jan's neat summation of you and your game:

Rob - it's simple.

Professional snipers were not told to create pretty Masonic patterns in the corpse of JFK.

They were tasked with killing a VIP target travelling in a moving car in a public place.

Your Hiram Abif bullshit is a straw man, which delegitimises serious research into, for instance, possible involvement of SMOM elements in the Kennedy hit.