Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis

[Peter Lemkin]

Charles, I feel (you don't) that is is mixing apples and oranges. Politics is separate from the technical issues. The DP view is therefore a CT because it supposed that the collapse was the intended outcome and CD was how it was done.

How can you have been a member of DPF for so long and understood so little?

Amen! Jeff, to me, your agenda is to slow [or if possible] stop progress on 911. I don't know [for sure] if it is your own peculiar mind-set or a job...but either way it doesn't fit here - yet you persist.....which leads ME to think it is a job, either way, you are very immune to not being appreciated for your unique 'genius', which the rest of us JUST can't grasp - nor could your fellow architects and structural engineers. 911 couldn't have happened without the first WTC bombing and that not without the OK bombing and that not without many things in between...and none of them without the Granddaddy of them all - the JFK Assassination. You are left looking at your zipper when the rest here are, for the most part, way way beyond you.....even if your job is to try to slow them down or stop them....it won't work. Start your own blog or Unzip Forum for 911 'Truth'. There is some total lack of connection you have to this Forum's basic ideas and ideals, IMHO. Once you led persons to believe you thought 911 an inside job, only that the towers fell due to your unzip theory - not CD....but now we see an 'de-evolution' to 911 in your posts as being pretty much the official version with a slightly different 'zip' or unzip to it. I say....go away.