16-08-2013, 07:40 PM
Lauren Johnson Wrote:Albert Doyle Wrote:Lauren,
Could you answer my point about Chandler's corner column CD theory? Specifically in the context of how the easy refutability of his corner CD claims reflects on his overall credibility and that of his theories.
Albert, I have noticed you have made demands of people to respond often accompanied with accusations. I just got done responding. I would expect something like, 'Thanks, Lauren. Hmmm. I'll think about it.'
Nope. Nothing. Just the next task. This has happened before. I'll pass.
You can't back your theories. Meanwhile a person who has made personal insinuations as responses to forensic arguments has the gall to correct my manners while flagrantly dodging proof she can't answer.
You're not seriously trying make people believe that you're doing this for reasons other than simply not being able to answer the simple facts? Honestly.
I made perfectly reasonable points. If you can't answer those points that means they stand. Reality dictates that if my points stand and Chandler's don't therefore his position isn't backed by credible argument or facts. Where is Tony to come in and back you up on this Lauren?
I'm sorry but I don't think you realize passing on this isn't a credible option if one is pretending credible debate on the cause of the Tower collapses. I made some perfectly reasonable forensic arguments about Mr Chandler's corner column CD claims. In short, the puffs coming off those columns are too slow to be explosives and don't show any of the white hot sparkling burning characteristics of thermite. If you can't answer you're only proving my point.