14-08-2013, 05:34 AM
Tony Szamboti Wrote:We know each aircraft that hit the towers had 10,000 gallons on them when they left Boston for their trips to the West Coast. The 767-200ER aircraft had a 7,700 mile range and would have only been fueled to their full 24,000 gallon capacity for that range.
It is likely that about half of the fuel or about 5,000 gallons made it into the towers with the other half going up in the exterior fireballs. Now if one takes 5,000 gallons and spreads it over one of the acre size floors of a twin tower they will have a 3/16" thickness. Over two floors 3/32" thickness and over three floors 3/64" thickness. NIST believes the fuel burned up quickly due to being aerosolized and a thin film. I agree with that contention.
Once again Tony tries to bamboozle us with a textbook theory response, but in reality it doesn't happen that way. The fuel would continue under inertia as the Purdue animators showed us. In some places it would pool and others it would wick in to materials like carpets, furniture etc. The fires are telling you that this was a fuel-associated fire because of the classic black plane crash smoke. Tony, once again, avoids answering the 23mph wind-stoked furnace effect because it is scientific fact he wants to go away. The back wall of the tower would arrest the sloshing fuel and pool it there. Also, gruesome as it is, bodies would also catch some fuel, wick it, and burn. In any case there's no doubt that intense fires burned there as the smoke showed. While Tony waves his textbook with one hand he tries to distract us from this.