Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis
A sharp eye would see the dust jets coursing down the tower couldn't be demolition charges because they are too big. Compare video from regular controlled demolitions and you can see right away the two don't compare. For those Twin Tower dust jets to be demo charges would mean they were much bigger than necessary. So much bigger that they would give the game away and probably blow the building apart. The reason they didn't blow the facade off is because they were air blasts, as is plainly obvious.

Watch the video. The high buildings have no such coursing blasts. Plus the dust at the bottom exits in a much less powerful, more billowing manner. Yet we have David Chandler intoning that this comical overkill, that conflicts with most known CD methods, is firm proof of controlled demolition:



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sK50So-yYRU


Messages In This Thread
Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis - by Albert Doyle - 13-08-2013, 07:22 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  WTC-7 Before Collapse - Video of activities inside and outside Peter Lemkin 0 5,949 04-12-2015, 09:45 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  New Detailed Analysis of WTC 7 Controlled Demolition Peter Lemkin 0 6,405 01-12-2015, 04:42 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  The case against the NIST WTC 7 collapse initiation analysis Tony Szamboti 5 6,046 29-11-2013, 04:31 AM
Last Post: Jeffrey Orling
  New Analysis Summary Of 9-11-01 Insider Trading [with some very interesting facts, if true]! Peter Lemkin 4 7,409 28-10-2013, 03:01 PM
Last Post: David Guyatt
  Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis: Redux Lauren Johnson 0 4,639 16-08-2013, 03:39 AM
Last Post: Lauren Johnson
  New Seismic Analysis Further Points to Controlled Demolition.... Peter Lemkin 0 4,566 03-12-2012, 05:21 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  911 Meta Analysis Jeffrey Orling 18 15,612 23-10-2012, 08:54 PM
Last Post: Albert Doyle
  STill the best and most comprehensive timeline and information source for 911-related events Peter Lemkin 0 3,543 10-08-2012, 08:10 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  New theory explains collapse of Twin Towers- Aluminium and water explosions Magda Hassan 7 12,733 27-09-2011, 05:47 PM
Last Post: Jeffrey Orling
  First Wikileaks Cable possibly related to 911, Al Quaeda, etc. Peter Lemkin 0 7,591 26-09-2011, 08:02 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)