Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Satygraha (Truth Force) vs. the so called non-lethal weapons
#4
Quote:Until then, I remind you of the truth: Anyone with reasonable access to the evidence in this case who does not conclude that a criminal conspiracy resulted in the murder of John Fitzgerald Kennedy is cognitively impaired and/or complicit in the crime.

I have always been troubled by this phrasing. It tends to place the imagined offender in the positions of a false choice between being called stupid or guilty of participation in the murder of the JFK. It glosses over degrees of complicity. It ignores that most people who deny that JFK was murdered by "criminal conspiracy" are themselves the victims of decades of mind control. Further, it does not take into account that there are those who believe in a version of "criminal conspiracy" that is itself a cover-up and therefore by your definition are complicit. Finally, as you are attempting to practice satygraha, it strikes me as being unkind and that by its very phrasing is self-defeating.

May I suggest a re-do?
"We'll know our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the American public believes is false." --William J. Casey, D.C.I

"We will lead every revolution against us."  --Theodore Herzl
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Satygraha (Truth Force) vs. the so called non-lethal weapons - by Lauren Johnson - 28-06-2013, 06:52 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Truth Is Offensive Adele Edisen 0 4,752 03-04-2013, 03:43 PM
Last Post: Adele Edisen
  The Driving Force In Society Is Fear - And It Can Be (And Is) Being Conditioned - Great Film! 0 751 Less than 1 minute ago
Last Post:

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)