13-06-2013, 03:38 PM
Simkin should be told that I just discovered something significant in other research because of something he wrote in relation to the recent DiEugenio banning. Simkin should know it was information he entered in response to the controversy stirred up by DiEugenio's banning. It's pure coincidence but it led to my discovering something important in other unrelated research. So he should know that contentious challenge like DiEugenio practices is not necessarily a bad thing because it leads people to defend their egos with some of their best knowledge. It's the information in that knowledge that leads to greater discoveries. If Simkin had followed-through on his threat to shut down his JFK forum it would have killed the discovery he just gave me.