03-06-2013, 05:28 PM
I get the impression Tracy that you've forgotten what happens to the tiny snowball when rolled down the mountain...
The "conspiracy" involves the suppression of actual evidence and the promotion of fraudulent evidence....
It involves a level of power that supercedes the FBI, GHoover, Warren, the POTUS, Congress, etc....
Read "Post Mortem" and then talk to us about "clever & sophisticated cover-up". When the lawyers and members of the Warren Commission are given a choice to show or suppress...
that which was supressed... contradicts the WCR conclusions and protects the guilty...
When on the flight back AF-1 learns that Oswald is the killer and there is no conspiracy.... from the WH Sit Room...
When the FBI report which becomes the WC Report concentrates more of Oswald's childhood than the FBI in the autopsy room at the time, or the doctors who attended Connally,
or the testimony of Dr McClellend.
If you are an expert at covert operations and KNOW that these types of operations could not be held together by "humans" please let us know.
Finally, I find it suprising that you would discount such a simple model in favor of what?
a few mechanics and facilitators getting together without the ok and cover of those in power ??
Who, other than a patsy, could have been charged with the crime and not unravel the security apparatus that was finally in place?
JFK wanted to unravel the CIA/MIC, so what better way to protect the guilty by wrapping the solving of such a crime in with the revealing of state secrets that simple could not be revealed...
The guilty have hid behind MANY layers of cover-up and conspiracy. The question of Humes' involvement as patriot or conspirator will forever be there...
If he was put into a position of making the choice between go along or drown... how about asking Roger Craig or Seymour Weitzman how "drowning" went
DJ
The "conspiracy" involves the suppression of actual evidence and the promotion of fraudulent evidence....
It involves a level of power that supercedes the FBI, GHoover, Warren, the POTUS, Congress, etc....
Read "Post Mortem" and then talk to us about "clever & sophisticated cover-up". When the lawyers and members of the Warren Commission are given a choice to show or suppress...
that which was supressed... contradicts the WCR conclusions and protects the guilty...
When on the flight back AF-1 learns that Oswald is the killer and there is no conspiracy.... from the WH Sit Room...
When the FBI report which becomes the WC Report concentrates more of Oswald's childhood than the FBI in the autopsy room at the time, or the doctors who attended Connally,
or the testimony of Dr McClellend.
If you are an expert at covert operations and KNOW that these types of operations could not be held together by "humans" please let us know.
Finally, I find it suprising that you would discount such a simple model in favor of what?
a few mechanics and facilitators getting together without the ok and cover of those in power ??
Who, other than a patsy, could have been charged with the crime and not unravel the security apparatus that was finally in place?
JFK wanted to unravel the CIA/MIC, so what better way to protect the guilty by wrapping the solving of such a crime in with the revealing of state secrets that simple could not be revealed...
The guilty have hid behind MANY layers of cover-up and conspiracy. The question of Humes' involvement as patriot or conspirator will forever be there...
If he was put into a position of making the choice between go along or drown... how about asking Roger Craig or Seymour Weitzman how "drowning" went
DJ
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter