Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Sponsor/Facilitator/Mechanic Model Applied to 9/11
#88
Albert Doyle Wrote:
Lauren Johnson Wrote:From a deep political point of view, the sponsors intended for the towers to come down on 9/11. Had they just stood there smoldering that day, would have sent the aftermath into an entirely different direction. Assuming there was no plane switching that day, body identification and recovery would have been the first task. The buildings would have been crawling with structural engineers analysing the buildings for safety, repair, and whatever demolition needed. Instead we were informed we had been attacked by 19 Arab fanatics who represent people who hate our freedom. The story still goes from there. I argue we would not be living that story if the buildings had been smoldering broken stubs.

Since the buildings had to fall, the sponsors would have had to be assured that just the act of crashing planes into the buildings would have guaranteed that result. No explosives needed? Fine. Let's roll.



I disagree. The Towers were enough of a prominent symbol of New York that simply having them as a perverse neo-con Statue Of Liberty torch belching black terrorist smoke for all to see was enough to elicit the response. Don't forget that these arab terrorists also successfully blasted through the main symbol and bastion of military power in America - the Pentagon. And if Flight 93 wasn't shot down by the fighter jet witnessed appearing right after the crash, that was denied by the authorities, then another Washington icon probably would have served as a gaping reminder of arab terror.

There's simply no way the US, under Bush and the neo-cons, would not have gone to war in the Middle East even with the Towers remaining standing.

"Do you remember watching it all unfold on television and feeling somehow like it "wasn't real"? That's a crucial symptom of traumatic dissociation. Your mind splits, blinks off for a moment, creating a critical space which can be filled with a new story, a new mythos. Before that, almost none of us gave a shit about terrorism or national security. But as a result of this trauma-based rite of passage, we were suddenly conditioned to a completely new value system one in which everything we held dear before was turned upside-down: personal freedom, the Bill of Rights, etc. It's virtually identical to what happens to a child in a traditional culture who is re-aligned to adulthood through ritual circumcision and the supporting transformative mythos. Maybe the World Trade Center tumbling down was the ritual circumcision of the American psyche. We are now adults. We are now warriors."

-Tim Boucher

The deeper purpose behind the 9/11 attacks had little to do with war or profit. Those were motivations, but secondary ones. The deeper purpose behind the attacks was psychological, and the wars that came afterward were only a part of that. I believe that a lot of the shooting massacres and the terrorist attacks we see are part of a deeply calculated program of psychological warfare designed to create a climate of fear.

The deepest motivation behind all of this, I believe, is a mixture of the occult and psychology.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
The Sponsor/Facilitator/Mechanic Model Applied to 9/11 - by Simon Copping-Patton - 26-05-2013, 09:23 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)