14-04-2013, 04:17 AM
Its really interesting i think that:
1.Phillips is running the anti FPCC crusade while Oswald is involved with it while working for Banister in the summer of 1963.
2.) Oswald is then seen with Phillips/Bishop in Dallas in late August of 1963.
3.) Oswald then allegedly goes to Mexico City where Phillips has a desk and is part of the cover up about whatever Oswald did there.
4.) Phillips then confesses to his brother that he was in Dallas on 11/22/63.
Its possible to see all this as a coincidence I guess. But the things is Phillips did a few very unusual things concerning the cover up of Kennedy's murder, even extraneous to this. But he also tried to cover up certain things about the Oswald affair in Mexico City which turned out to be a mirage.
He then went nuts when he was exposed and started suing people left and right.
Very suspicious.
1.Phillips is running the anti FPCC crusade while Oswald is involved with it while working for Banister in the summer of 1963.
2.) Oswald is then seen with Phillips/Bishop in Dallas in late August of 1963.
3.) Oswald then allegedly goes to Mexico City where Phillips has a desk and is part of the cover up about whatever Oswald did there.
4.) Phillips then confesses to his brother that he was in Dallas on 11/22/63.
Its possible to see all this as a coincidence I guess. But the things is Phillips did a few very unusual things concerning the cover up of Kennedy's murder, even extraneous to this. But he also tried to cover up certain things about the Oswald affair in Mexico City which turned out to be a mirage.
He then went nuts when he was exposed and started suing people left and right.
Very suspicious.