12-03-2013, 05:18 PM
Charles Drago Wrote:David Josephs Wrote:why and how I come to this speculation is not anything I prefer to discuss with you at this point... given your initial response...
that you can't make those connections yourself speaks volumes, "bubby"
but if you'd like, and think you can.... prove me wrong.
You're dumber than I thought.
I carry no burden of proof whatsoever in this matter.
You made the assertion. The burden is on you to support it.
But since you cannot support it, you stamp your little size 5 feet and squeal, in essence, "Charlie's a bully so I won't answer him."
Oooooooooh, I'm such a BITCH!
I ask you again:
Do you stand by your assertion that there is good reason (which you've yet to state) to conclude that the photo was taken at No Name Key "before anyting [sic] else"?
Because THAT is the question I originally raised, and THAT is the question you are dodging.
Answer the question. Share with us why the No Name Key identification should be accepted "before anyting [sic] else". Show us why you made that knee-jerk assertion.
Or go away.
{YAWN}
You're 30 seconds are up... and you have nothing to learn from me....
move along.
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter