04-03-2013, 06:35 AM
Mr. Ryan I do NOT direct this at you personally,
Anyone alive in 1963 knows the great change on our lives that came about as a direct result of the Murder of our Chief Executive. Part of those resultant changes came because all of us 'survivors' accepted half truths to stand in for truth.
Creative processes will always involve the authors views and opinions of any real events even if the influence is subconscious. Looking back now my view of the events 1960 - 1970 that I lived clearly demonstrate a night and day contrast, before and after the Murder by state of John Kennedy.
The empowerment of the Big Lie - that any number of lone-nuts killed the President - was made possible by the blind acceptance of anything the Government said of that time. It was a time when Cops were respected, teachers were treated as very valuable members of a community and both workers for the society were known personally by the people. The US Government was trusted before the SE Asia Games ('Nam) and Watergate. No kidding.
There were two results of the loss of faith in the governance. One was a generation that made me proud to be part of the 'mickey mouse club' generation - we took it to the street at personal cost. Putting your as* on the line for your beliefs is a courageous thing. Redress of Grievance is a right on paper only. Speaking truth to power is not rewarding in money but pays well in self respect and other intangibles.
The second result of confrontation with the powers-that-be was a new view to investigate the Murders of the Kennedy's and Martin King even if the individual citizens had to do so for themselves to refute the LIES of the Warren Commission. So WeThePeople did so in the face of media ridicule and even "resistance from behind".
For many decades all of us that KNOW by studying the evidence that the Murders were acts of a hidden LYING segment of Government Power have been insulted by name-calling and MSM slanders. That would make anyone angry and sensitive, moreover when you KNOW the reality by conclusions reached by examining evidence not hyperbole.
A longer and harsher reaction comes about when one encounters anything that glosses over the reality of 1963 even 50 years on, or maybe because history is 50 years on now.
REALITY: TWO CONSPIRACIES EXIST IN THE EVENTS OF NOVEMBER 1963.
BOTH FACTS NEED TO BE PROMOTED IN THE MEDIA.
1. LHO is NOT the whole tale of the Murder.
2. Conspiracy to Obstruct Justice in the Big Lie Cover Up is fact.
If all this is "intellectual bullshit" then all that think so can kiss my as*.
The Big Lie MUST BE EXPOSED as bullshit if there is to be much chance to change the future.
Hanks and Bugliosi and Pose-ner and the fools that came before them have had their time at bat. It is most assuredly time to change the batter and jeer the liars out of the batters' box.
They are provable in being guilty of trying to mislead the people AGAIN. Their area of operations are against WeThePeople and against Truth. The truth is not found in them.
Not on my watch will BS be allowed to stand in for truth.
I must recommend Jim Douglass' JFK and the Unspeakable for exposing the truth to the still uninformed.
As Kurt Vonnegut said "And So It Goes"
Anyone alive in 1963 knows the great change on our lives that came about as a direct result of the Murder of our Chief Executive. Part of those resultant changes came because all of us 'survivors' accepted half truths to stand in for truth.
Creative processes will always involve the authors views and opinions of any real events even if the influence is subconscious. Looking back now my view of the events 1960 - 1970 that I lived clearly demonstrate a night and day contrast, before and after the Murder by state of John Kennedy.
The empowerment of the Big Lie - that any number of lone-nuts killed the President - was made possible by the blind acceptance of anything the Government said of that time. It was a time when Cops were respected, teachers were treated as very valuable members of a community and both workers for the society were known personally by the people. The US Government was trusted before the SE Asia Games ('Nam) and Watergate. No kidding.
There were two results of the loss of faith in the governance. One was a generation that made me proud to be part of the 'mickey mouse club' generation - we took it to the street at personal cost. Putting your as* on the line for your beliefs is a courageous thing. Redress of Grievance is a right on paper only. Speaking truth to power is not rewarding in money but pays well in self respect and other intangibles.
The second result of confrontation with the powers-that-be was a new view to investigate the Murders of the Kennedy's and Martin King even if the individual citizens had to do so for themselves to refute the LIES of the Warren Commission. So WeThePeople did so in the face of media ridicule and even "resistance from behind".
For many decades all of us that KNOW by studying the evidence that the Murders were acts of a hidden LYING segment of Government Power have been insulted by name-calling and MSM slanders. That would make anyone angry and sensitive, moreover when you KNOW the reality by conclusions reached by examining evidence not hyperbole.
A longer and harsher reaction comes about when one encounters anything that glosses over the reality of 1963 even 50 years on, or maybe because history is 50 years on now.
REALITY: TWO CONSPIRACIES EXIST IN THE EVENTS OF NOVEMBER 1963.
BOTH FACTS NEED TO BE PROMOTED IN THE MEDIA.
1. LHO is NOT the whole tale of the Murder.
2. Conspiracy to Obstruct Justice in the Big Lie Cover Up is fact.
If all this is "intellectual bullshit" then all that think so can kiss my as*.
The Big Lie MUST BE EXPOSED as bullshit if there is to be much chance to change the future.
Hanks and Bugliosi and Pose-ner and the fools that came before them have had their time at bat. It is most assuredly time to change the batter and jeer the liars out of the batters' box.
They are provable in being guilty of trying to mislead the people AGAIN. Their area of operations are against WeThePeople and against Truth. The truth is not found in them.
Not on my watch will BS be allowed to stand in for truth.
I must recommend Jim Douglass' JFK and the Unspeakable for exposing the truth to the still uninformed.
As Kurt Vonnegut said "And So It Goes"
Read not to contradict and confute;
nor to believe and take for granted;
nor to find talk and discourse;
but to weigh and consider.
FRANCIS BACON
nor to believe and take for granted;
nor to find talk and discourse;
but to weigh and consider.
FRANCIS BACON