12-02-2013, 07:21 PM
Cliff Varnell Wrote:Charles Drago Wrote:By definition, if we debate the conspiracy/LN "controversy," we lose.
The zealotry of the recently converted courses through my veins, Charles.
Here's how I formulate the issue:
Conspiracy in the murder of JFK is not a question to be debated; it's a fact to be observed, to wit: the bullet holes in the back of JFK's shirt and jacket are too low to have been associated with the throat wound.
There is NO fact-based challenge to this formulation -- only Assassination Pron.
Without commenting on the validity of the proof for which you powerfully argue, I feel that it would be a monumental error for us to place all of our eggs in any single proof-of-conspiracy basket.
And I know PRONography when I ees it!
Charles Drago
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene