Climate Change News and Article Collection

[Lauren Johnson]

My point to all this, of course, (and I can easily go on from here) is that it is not very difficult to show "alarming" data biased toward one's own agenda. The problem with drawing conclusions based on same is obvious:
Data is only as good as the interpretation accompanying it. Moreover, the independent analysis of it must be solidly based in GOOD scientific practices. Where any examples of similar systemic behavior of climate exist
separate from the presumed "forcing factors" being argued by MMGW proponents, a re-evaluation of the hypothesis is in order. Rather, what we have here is a stubborn "Church of Climatology" doctrine being promoted
irrespective of fatal flaws being employed in direct opposition to Scientific Method.

Greg, In many ways your points are spot on and well taken IF climate change science were the fraud that you believe it to be.

I don't. I don't intend to argue the point. I will continue to post what I consider to be relevant and you of course are invited to do the same.

From a deep political point of view, I regard climate change as a very effective weapon for the continuance of The Agenda, while following the model of gaining money and power while breaking something and then doing the same thing while fixing it. I suspect the elites buy into climate science. They just want to weaponize it.