07-12-2012, 09:34 PM
At this point in the thread, Albert appears competent when compared to you. For
your edification as well as his, arguments by elimination have the following form:
p or q; but not-p; therefore, q.
Lovelady or Oswald;
but not-Lovelady;
therefore, Oswald.
Even you should be able to grasp that. And we have proven directly that it was
Oswald as well as indirectly and have proven directly that it was not Lovelady.
But you are so far gone, I expect the men in white suits will be showing up soon.
Your incapacity to see yourself as others see you now is simply beyond belief.
your edification as well as his, arguments by elimination have the following form:
p or q; but not-p; therefore, q.
Lovelady or Oswald;
but not-Lovelady;
therefore, Oswald.
Even you should be able to grasp that. And we have proven directly that it was
Oswald as well as indirectly and have proven directly that it was not Lovelady.
But you are so far gone, I expect the men in white suits will be showing up soon.
Your incapacity to see yourself as others see you now is simply beyond belief.
Charles Drago Wrote:The "Albert"/"Fetzer" "dialogue" --
When I was a kid, talking to yourself was considered a sign of madness.
