21-11-2012, 04:03 AM
(This post was last modified: 21-11-2012, 04:22 AM by Charles Drago.)
I have been waiting for the "Betty Chruscielski" entity to appear in the wake of the "Albert Doyle" controversy.
On the following thread
https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/sho...ruscielski
"Chruscielski" argued that JFK was shot by a gunman in the motorcade's lead car and that Greer fired the head shot.
I'm inclined to conclude that the point in resurrecting "Chruscielski" now is to prompt me and others who saw through the original fiction to remind one and all of "her" purpose. Soon will come the cries that I have lost touch and that I am seeing agents provocateur behind every bush.
So be it.
I share with you the following observations which I made on June 6, 2011, on the thread linked above:
The Greer and Lead Car "arguments" have been exposed for what they are -- fictions designed to distract and fragment JFK assassination investigators.
Is "Betty Chruscielski" simply a well-intentioned fool? An agent of disinformation? A real person or a composite identity?
In the final analysis, "her" intentions and identity are of keen interest. But "her" presentations here must be treated with utter disdain.
Expose the falsehoods. Laugh "her" out of the room.
But under no circumstances engage "her" in debate.
If we do, then the killers of JFK win the day.
Our own Magda Hassan tore into "Chruscielski" on that thread as follows:
Originally Posted by Betty Chruscielski
My theory is the shot came from the back window of the lead car.
Hassan:
Which window? This is unclear. The rear passenger window or the rear windscreen?
Originally Posted by Betty Chruscielski
That back window would be a mafia window that's able to be opened to allow the hit to happen.
Hassan:
It could also be a magic window and magically disappear at the right moment....Perhaps another magic bullet fired from another magic gun too. Perhaps it had a magic sun roof too to shoot from. The possibilities are endless.
Originally Posted by Betty Chruscielski
The mafia for years have had the ability to do drive by hits from rear windows of cars.
Hassan:
Mmmm...yeah, and bust kneecaps and cut off fingers.
Originally Posted by Betty Chruscielski
The significance of having someone looking backwards is that that person would know what was happening in the limo.
Hassan:
It has no significance at all. It doesn't follow at all.
Originally Posted by Betty Chruscielski
Jesse Curry said to the WC he saw a commotion in the limo through his rear view mirror but didn't know what was happening until the motorcycle cop James Chainey [sic] came and told him. So Jesse Curry lied. Why did he lie?
Hassan:
Doesn't mean he lied at all. If JC saw a commotion in the rear view mirror doesn't mean he can't also look back out the window for a better view. Not that this is going to solve his curiosity either. Just because he tried to get a better view doesn't mean he got a better view or understood any better what was going on.
"Chruscielski" last posted on that thread on June 7, 2011.
On the following thread
https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/sho...ruscielski
"Chruscielski" argued that JFK was shot by a gunman in the motorcade's lead car and that Greer fired the head shot.
I'm inclined to conclude that the point in resurrecting "Chruscielski" now is to prompt me and others who saw through the original fiction to remind one and all of "her" purpose. Soon will come the cries that I have lost touch and that I am seeing agents provocateur behind every bush.
So be it.
I share with you the following observations which I made on June 6, 2011, on the thread linked above:
The Greer and Lead Car "arguments" have been exposed for what they are -- fictions designed to distract and fragment JFK assassination investigators.
Is "Betty Chruscielski" simply a well-intentioned fool? An agent of disinformation? A real person or a composite identity?
In the final analysis, "her" intentions and identity are of keen interest. But "her" presentations here must be treated with utter disdain.
Expose the falsehoods. Laugh "her" out of the room.
But under no circumstances engage "her" in debate.
If we do, then the killers of JFK win the day.
Our own Magda Hassan tore into "Chruscielski" on that thread as follows:
Originally Posted by Betty Chruscielski
My theory is the shot came from the back window of the lead car.
Hassan:
Which window? This is unclear. The rear passenger window or the rear windscreen?
Originally Posted by Betty Chruscielski
That back window would be a mafia window that's able to be opened to allow the hit to happen.
Hassan:
It could also be a magic window and magically disappear at the right moment....Perhaps another magic bullet fired from another magic gun too. Perhaps it had a magic sun roof too to shoot from. The possibilities are endless.
Originally Posted by Betty Chruscielski
The mafia for years have had the ability to do drive by hits from rear windows of cars.
Hassan:
Mmmm...yeah, and bust kneecaps and cut off fingers.
Originally Posted by Betty Chruscielski
The significance of having someone looking backwards is that that person would know what was happening in the limo.
Hassan:
It has no significance at all. It doesn't follow at all.
Originally Posted by Betty Chruscielski
Jesse Curry said to the WC he saw a commotion in the limo through his rear view mirror but didn't know what was happening until the motorcycle cop James Chainey [sic] came and told him. So Jesse Curry lied. Why did he lie?
Hassan:
Doesn't mean he lied at all. If JC saw a commotion in the rear view mirror doesn't mean he can't also look back out the window for a better view. Not that this is going to solve his curiosity either. Just because he tried to get a better view doesn't mean he got a better view or understood any better what was going on.
"Chruscielski" last posted on that thread on June 7, 2011.
Charles Drago
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene