19-10-2012, 06:52 PM
Jeffrey Orling Wrote:You can accept that as hard evidence. I don't.
The DOB and FDNY assessed the structure throughout the day and determined in the afternoon it would come down.. ie it would not last because of the structural damage and unfought fires. They informed the press and so the press had "fore knowledge" ... no different than predicting an eclipse.
I have not heard any audio which sounds like a detonation sequence. If you have a link., please post it.
When the actual collapse began #3 transfer truss gave way. I would think it would be quite noisy and the entire column 79 line for 40 stories came down... that would make a staccato sound as each column section hit ground.
You WANT to accept the accounts you cite as evidence to support your pre conceived belief. Nothing will shake those beliefs. Congregation... please be seated.
The videos are in post #69. The auio analysis is in the Ashley Banfield sequence. But we both know that will not make any difference. I have come to my conclusions only after years of denial and then skepticim. Now it is Game, Set, Match. Your only recourse is deny, deny, deny. Your analysis is at least plausible. But the video evidence in #69 is the final proof that you are wrong.
"We'll know our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the American public believes is false." --William J. Casey, D.C.I
"We will lead every revolution against us." --Theodore Herzl
"We will lead every revolution against us." --Theodore Herzl