22-08-2012, 02:59 PM
Triggered by curiosity why, according to a "mole" in the BBC, BBC reporters are not allowed to mention the name of Irmeli Krans (besides Anna Ardin), I found this little piece:
http://rixstep.com/1/20110311,00.shtml
It turns out that Irmely Krans is the police interrogator who took testimony from Sofia Wilen on 20 August, 2010. Sofia Wilen refused to sign it.
It also turns out that Irmely Krans is a friend of Anna Ardin. Sofia Wilen was also a friend of Anna Ardin, don't know if she still is.
It is a small world indeed.
And why, again, is it not allowed to mention that on the BBC?
See also http://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2...ned-names/
http://rixstep.com/1/20110311,00.shtml
It turns out that Irmely Krans is the police interrogator who took testimony from Sofia Wilen on 20 August, 2010. Sofia Wilen refused to sign it.
It also turns out that Irmely Krans is a friend of Anna Ardin. Sofia Wilen was also a friend of Anna Ardin, don't know if she still is.
It is a small world indeed.
And why, again, is it not allowed to mention that on the BBC?
See also http://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2...ned-names/
The most relevant literature regarding what happened since September 11, 2001 is George Orwell's "1984".