10-07-2012, 07:35 AM
Charles Drago Wrote:Thank you very much, John.
FWIW, I have serious problems with Mr. Schotz's conclusion as to the identities of the Sponsors of JFK's murder.
He writes: "At the time of the assassination what would have happened if it had been acknowledged that the assassination had been a high level conspiracy of the US military intelligence apparatus?"
My answer: Yet again, and in the absence of presentation by the author of the conspiracy model on which his analysis is built, a Facilitator of the assassination would have been identified as its Sponsor; as a consequence, the coverup would have been preserved and enhanced.
Charles i have not read the book "History will not Absolve us" but i have read the numerous reviews that are currently available on the internet. There is one to be found at
http://www.acorn.net/jfkplace/09/fp.back...story.html
At the end of the review we find one imaginary conversation between JFK and Allen Dulles in heaven Kennedy is sitting in a rocking chair when Dulles comes sauntering along.......
.......Dulles does most of the talking. He tells JFK that he, JFK, had assaulted democracy by first running on an anti-communist platform, then turning away from it after his election. And the people, Dulles says --- meaning the CIA, apparently --- had the right to correct that mistake. Dulles says that if JFK had suffered a fatal stroke instead of being assassinated, the transition of power would have worked just the same: "We didn't take over the government, we just shot you." At the end of this dialogue, Kennedy not only accepts what Dulles says, he asks his forgiveness!
Now i repeat i have not read the book and i have the greatest respect for Vince Salandria, but if that's true, this acceptance by Kennedy is very subtle, devious, dangerous and provocative.
It would mean that although Schotz blames the right people for the murder he has JFK to admit that he was rightly executed and legitimizes their decision to kill him.
Again i have not read the book and maybe i have misunderstood the above passage, so i would ask the members of this forum to clarify the issue if they could.