02-07-2012, 04:21 PM
Albert:
And therein lies the problem for people who do not know the MM imbroglio well.
If there was anything in the so called "diary", then why did Angleton not get it into the press through any of his many assets?
He did not. And he had 23 years to do so.
This is a question that was in my original 1997 essay. Which Janney has read, but he never answers.
As per "engineers", this is precisely what Jannney does not do. He does not measure the water solubility of the witnesses at the time of their testimony. Or the relationships between the witness and the scribes. And that is important here. And its something I will point out.
As per Angleton being at Mary's that night. Cicely, his wife, was friends with Mary. They had an engagement that evening.
And therein lies the problem for people who do not know the MM imbroglio well.
If there was anything in the so called "diary", then why did Angleton not get it into the press through any of his many assets?
He did not. And he had 23 years to do so.
This is a question that was in my original 1997 essay. Which Janney has read, but he never answers.
As per "engineers", this is precisely what Jannney does not do. He does not measure the water solubility of the witnesses at the time of their testimony. Or the relationships between the witness and the scribes. And that is important here. And its something I will point out.
As per Angleton being at Mary's that night. Cicely, his wife, was friends with Mary. They had an engagement that evening.