24-05-2012, 12:19 PM
Albert Doyle Wrote:Predictably, Cinque is Welshing. He's saying he never said he would pay $8,000 if it was shown that it came from the same film, only a different film. He's a liar though because he clearly stated on Lancer that he would pay $8,000 if someone could show the source. -Any source.
If you go to the Lancer thread every one of Ralph's posts are edited. The little lying weasel went back and removed his $8,000 challenge from the thread.
.
Great work on taking apart Cinque and Fetzer. I honestly don't know anybody who has worked as tirelessly as yourself on this issue. The 8000 challenge is a joke and good for mentioning it. However, as much as I find Don slightly namby pamby in the face of horrific disinformation. Not to mention us all wanting to hold hands and dance around Maypoles together with all manner of disinfo Queens. He does have back up from Jim Di on this one. Contrary to your comments it appears that Jim, Al he does not endorse the picture as being Oswald. Like Don he thinks Cinque and Fetzers methods are ridiculous nor is he sold on the image being Lovelady. After weighing it all up. Not to mention reading Don's link, I have to say that I actually agree with you Al. I believe Oswald was Lovelady. That's not to say that Don and Jim Di are wrong for being unconvinced. That's simply their outlook and take on it all! I am fairly convinced that Jim Di does not believe it is Oswald on the stairs however.
"In the Kennedy assassination we must be careful of running off into the ether of our own imaginations." Carl Ogelsby circa 1992

