21-05-2012, 03:55 PM
Don,
Your points supporting the possibility of Doorway Man being Oswald are weak. There's no doubt that all other photographic evidence of Lovelady in the entryway to the Depository 1) show him in the correct position for the Altgens shot 2) Universally show him wearing the plaid shirt. You and Fetzer have failed to show any arguments proving how the alleged forgers managed to change all these other shots? Especially Weigman, which clearly shows Lovelady in the plaid shirt and holding on to the railing in the right spot. You make an argument for Lovelady sitting, but this is easily disproven by Lovelady standing and holding onto the railing in Weigman - where there wasn't any time for him to jump up from a sitting position and stand. So while you say you offer a reasonable counter-position on the Doorway Man issue you show in your own public statements that you fail to offer information that honors the reasonably established facts. The problem I have with yours and Greg's arguments is that you dwell on regressive positions while failing to see the cutting edge of the argument is up here with these points.
If Lovelady and Oswald resembled each other it is mainly because of the planted suggestion of these theories. Any close look will show the distinct features of Lovelady on the man in question. Even Fetzer and Cinque admit the man's bears Lovelady's features. The question, then, is were they placed onto this figure by forgery? So far, as you yourself admit, Fetzer and Cinque have not been able to produce any sound evidence showing how this was done. Especially in the way of possession times of the Altgen film. Fetzer now has mobile CIA forgery labs floating around Dealey Plaza. At what point do we draw the line for the ridiculous?
The idea of Oswald sprinting back up to the lunchroom from the front door is even less likely than Oswald sprinting down from the 6th floor. There's no way Oswald could have done that and not been out of breath when confronted by Truly and Baker. Or not have been seen either. I feel you don't have a good grasp of Oswald in your speculations. As I've written previously, Oswald's behavior at the police station shows he was maintaining cover, which means he was following orders. So there's no reason to think he wasn't doing the same thing at the Depository when he was in the 2nd floor lunchroom and not watching the motorcade. The facts show there's no reason to ignore all this and suggest he should have been out on the front steps. The most reasonable explanation for Oswald being in the lunchroom is that he was being set-up as an Operation Northwoods patsy and needed to be out of the way during the shooting.
Your points supporting the possibility of Doorway Man being Oswald are weak. There's no doubt that all other photographic evidence of Lovelady in the entryway to the Depository 1) show him in the correct position for the Altgens shot 2) Universally show him wearing the plaid shirt. You and Fetzer have failed to show any arguments proving how the alleged forgers managed to change all these other shots? Especially Weigman, which clearly shows Lovelady in the plaid shirt and holding on to the railing in the right spot. You make an argument for Lovelady sitting, but this is easily disproven by Lovelady standing and holding onto the railing in Weigman - where there wasn't any time for him to jump up from a sitting position and stand. So while you say you offer a reasonable counter-position on the Doorway Man issue you show in your own public statements that you fail to offer information that honors the reasonably established facts. The problem I have with yours and Greg's arguments is that you dwell on regressive positions while failing to see the cutting edge of the argument is up here with these points.
If Lovelady and Oswald resembled each other it is mainly because of the planted suggestion of these theories. Any close look will show the distinct features of Lovelady on the man in question. Even Fetzer and Cinque admit the man's bears Lovelady's features. The question, then, is were they placed onto this figure by forgery? So far, as you yourself admit, Fetzer and Cinque have not been able to produce any sound evidence showing how this was done. Especially in the way of possession times of the Altgen film. Fetzer now has mobile CIA forgery labs floating around Dealey Plaza. At what point do we draw the line for the ridiculous?
The idea of Oswald sprinting back up to the lunchroom from the front door is even less likely than Oswald sprinting down from the 6th floor. There's no way Oswald could have done that and not been out of breath when confronted by Truly and Baker. Or not have been seen either. I feel you don't have a good grasp of Oswald in your speculations. As I've written previously, Oswald's behavior at the police station shows he was maintaining cover, which means he was following orders. So there's no reason to think he wasn't doing the same thing at the Depository when he was in the 2nd floor lunchroom and not watching the motorcade. The facts show there's no reason to ignore all this and suggest he should have been out on the front steps. The most reasonable explanation for Oswald being in the lunchroom is that he was being set-up as an Operation Northwoods patsy and needed to be out of the way during the shooting.