06-02-2012, 07:59 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-02-2012, 09:51 PM by Albert Doyle.)
Fetzer fails to realize that Fritz's notes were written quickly and used shorthand abbreviation of both script and context for purposes of expediency. As usual Fetzer tries to exploit this as much as possible to support his theories.
There's a simple thing that needs to be said. Fritz entered Oswald's description of the encounter with Baker in the lunchroom before he entered this information about the front steps. What Fetzer is clearly dodging and needs to answer for is, if this front steps business occurred before the Baker incident then why didn't Fritz enter it before Oswald's lunchroom account? What Fetzer needs to answer for is why everything else is in correct chronological order in Fritz's notes except this claimed front steps business?
What's more is if you interpolate Fritz's abbreviated script correctly, the true context is: [Oswald experiences Baker encounter] [Then] [Oswald went] out, with Bill Shelley [present] on [the] front steps [while he did so].
.
There's a simple thing that needs to be said. Fritz entered Oswald's description of the encounter with Baker in the lunchroom before he entered this information about the front steps. What Fetzer is clearly dodging and needs to answer for is, if this front steps business occurred before the Baker incident then why didn't Fritz enter it before Oswald's lunchroom account? What Fetzer needs to answer for is why everything else is in correct chronological order in Fritz's notes except this claimed front steps business?
What's more is if you interpolate Fritz's abbreviated script correctly, the true context is: [Oswald experiences Baker encounter] [Then] [Oswald went] out, with Bill Shelley [present] on [the] front steps [while he did so].
.