05-02-2012, 05:44 PM
Don Jeffries Wrote:Fuck off? Fuck you? Is that the level of debate you want? Are any of you sticking out your tongues as you write this?
I think Cinque has made a pretty good case here. The questions about the shirt alone ought to raise doubts in thinking minds. How can any shirt looker newer eight years down the road? I don't see a pocket in the '71 shirt. We know that Lovelady lied. We also know that the authorities had a very strong motive to force that person in the doorway to be someone else besides Oswald.
How many of you have ever worked with someone who was such a dead ringer for you that he could even fool your wife and kids? We know that there was an orchestrated campaign to impersonate Oswald in the weeks leading up to the assassination (whether or not one buys into the Harvey and Lee theory). Isn't it just too much of a coincidence that LHO happens to find employment, during the same time period, at a place where one of his co-workers appears to be eminently qualified to impersonate Oswald himself?
Not only does McKnight still believe Oswald was the figure in the doorway, so does well- respected critic David Wrone. I'd be surprised if Mark Lane still doesn't believe it. I don't think Harold Weisberg, Penn Jones, etc. ever came to the belief that it was Lovelady. Every aspect of the official story is dubious, and every CTer should be skeptical when the chorus becomes "THAT was solved. Move on!" Imho, the matter of the identity of the figure in the doorway hasn't been solved.
If it has not been solved, Don, why do Fetzer and Cinque insist that NOW it has?
GO_SECURE
monk
"It is difficult to abolish prejudice in those bereft of ideas. The more hatred is superficial, the more it runs deep."
James Hepburn -- Farewell America (1968)
monk
"It is difficult to abolish prejudice in those bereft of ideas. The more hatred is superficial, the more it runs deep."
James Hepburn -- Farewell America (1968)

