TSBD Doorway man - Oswald or Lovelady?

[Albert Doyle]

A sunlite skin patch? Are you crazy? It is shade. And you can see it on both sides of his t-shirt, and they form a line with each other. And if both of those slivers were his skin, then where would that leave the shape of the t-shirt? It would no longer be vee OR round. It would be practically straight across, horizontal. That's all you'd have left. Take a look at it again.

Your input is, once again, incoherent and not only doesn't answer the point but shows that you have no understanding at all of what is being discussed. The reason there are two lighter-small patches on either side of the "V" is because it is bare skin outside of the chin shadow. Your responses show a crazy inability to recognize or coherently articulate what is plainly there and has been cited by other credible researchers like Lamson. Your "It would be practically straight across" doesn't correspond to any rational meaning and is, yet again, more senseless mumbo jumbo. The two slivers of sunlit skin are the areas not covered by the chin shadow. They are entities separate and identifiable from both the chin shadow and the round-neck T-shirt clearly observed in Marsh. They destroy your V-notch theory because they prove the chin shadow is separate from the exposed patches of sunlit skin, and is, therefore, shadow and not any V-necked T-shirt. If it wasn't shadow then the whole front neck area would be light-colored like the skin patches.


"If both of those slivers were his skin, then where would that leave the shape of the t-shirt?"


Round. As it is in Altgens and reality. Oswald's T-shirt was damaged at the theater. Both you and Fetzer show a cowardly inability to answer for this.

And as far as trying to get me banned, listen good, Doyle: Dr. Fetzer will raise holy hell about it, and he's got rights here too.

You obviously have a complete lack of sense of where you and your bogus arguments exist in the scheme of things. Dr Fetzer's 'rights', just like anyone's, only exist to the extent he, like anyone, is able to live up to the proven, vetted standard. Since he scoots every time he is asked to live-up to this standard in credible arguments he has to suffer the same fate as anyone. Dr Fetzer's 'rights' exist at the far end of my last post to him that he failed to answer. Just like you. If Dr Fetzer had any credible rights to the extent you suggest he'd be here answering these conclusive points. It's obvious why he isn't.

This is a forum, which means that it's about the expression of ideas, and for you to try to silence ideas by banning someone turns this into Nazi Germany. Is that what you want? So, try as hard as you can to win, but you can't win that way. By doing that, you would only be admitting defeat.

And by the way, what about that button on Lovelady's flap?

You're simply an ignorant ass who has been allowed to yell "FIRE!" over and over again in a crowded theater without any credible accountability. The button is yet another cross-eyed illusion coming from an unwell crank. You have failed to identify what exactly is causing the 'shade' (Because you can't).