21-12-2011, 05:45 PM
I can see why some might theorize that Ruby shot a blank. Once you enter the world of CIA doubles anything is possible. In a way it would explain why Ruby would be willing to offer himself as a sacrifice. But for those looking in to this seriously and able to discuss it factually the suggestion that no blood at the scene would indicate a blank is qualified by how Oswald appeared at the hospital. If he was still relatively blood-free at Parkland upon arrival it sort of disproves the blank theory. I'm not sure Schweitzer is a dirty disinformationist as much as getting carried away. And don't forget any CIA shooting of Oswald in the ambulance would require the cooperation of ambulance attendants Hardin and Wolfe.
I'm with Lane and his emphasis of CIA. I think it is necessary and called for. And what speaks the most is I don't see anyone criticizing Lane. In my mind if CIA are the ones with their hands around your throat you deal with them first - no matter who is sponsoring them...
I'm with Lane and his emphasis of CIA. I think it is necessary and called for. And what speaks the most is I don't see anyone criticizing Lane. In my mind if CIA are the ones with their hands around your throat you deal with them first - no matter who is sponsoring them...