20-11-2011, 10:58 AM
[ATTACH=CONFIG]3226[/ATTACH]
Max Holland Rescues the Warren Commission and the Nation
http://www.ctka.net/pr900-holland.html
I'm reading Mark Lane, Last Word: My Indictment of the CIA in the Murder of JFK. He would certainly have fun one-on-one with Max Holland.
Do we really need whiz-bang digital enhancement. Oswald wasn't on the sixth floor. The head shot didn't come from the sixth floor. Oswald didn't have GSR on his cheek--per DPD and AEC's Oak Ridge Lab, though seven test shooters of the MC did have. But then Oswald didn't order, purchase, receive, practice with, transport or use the MC per Gil Jesus http://www.jfklancerforum.com/dc/dcboard...g_id=85804 "10 REASONS WHY I BELIEVE THE "OSWALD RIFLE" ISN'T OSWALD'S" Similar proofs from George Michael Evica and Charles Drago https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/sho...-the-Rifle Evica on the Carcano: Oswald Never Possessed the Rifle
Eleven seconds? How could one tell from the film--one clear frame followed by a blurred one; a black trapezoid on the rear of JFK's head. A bubble gum wound with no spray to account for Hargis.
Gerald D. McKnight in Breach of Trust: How the Warren Commission Failed the Nation and Why, Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, and Sylvia Meagher, Accessories After the Fact, plus another fifty solid researchers' works have nailed the coffin shut on the putrid corpse of complicity and coverup.
There is no end to what the CIA can prove digitally. While the FBI dispatched Dartmouth's Hany Farid to go la-la-la-I-can't-hear-you past the Backyard Photo graveyard, nose shadow add-on and all, the CIA presents the cartoon of TWA Flight 800 which ignores the missile seen by a hundred or more, the evidence of explosive residue, etcetera.
Surely Ptolemy can prove circular orbits with a few more epicycles.
Give Langley just one more "documentary" on a Mockingbird channel with yet one more shrieking fairy or carping harpy of the Confusatorium.
Max Holland Rescues the Warren Commission and the Nation
http://www.ctka.net/pr900-holland.html
I'm reading Mark Lane, Last Word: My Indictment of the CIA in the Murder of JFK. He would certainly have fun one-on-one with Max Holland.
Do we really need whiz-bang digital enhancement. Oswald wasn't on the sixth floor. The head shot didn't come from the sixth floor. Oswald didn't have GSR on his cheek--per DPD and AEC's Oak Ridge Lab, though seven test shooters of the MC did have. But then Oswald didn't order, purchase, receive, practice with, transport or use the MC per Gil Jesus http://www.jfklancerforum.com/dc/dcboard...g_id=85804 "10 REASONS WHY I BELIEVE THE "OSWALD RIFLE" ISN'T OSWALD'S" Similar proofs from George Michael Evica and Charles Drago https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/sho...-the-Rifle Evica on the Carcano: Oswald Never Possessed the Rifle
Eleven seconds? How could one tell from the film--one clear frame followed by a blurred one; a black trapezoid on the rear of JFK's head. A bubble gum wound with no spray to account for Hargis.
Gerald D. McKnight in Breach of Trust: How the Warren Commission Failed the Nation and Why, Mark Lane, Rush to Judgment, and Sylvia Meagher, Accessories After the Fact, plus another fifty solid researchers' works have nailed the coffin shut on the putrid corpse of complicity and coverup.
There is no end to what the CIA can prove digitally. While the FBI dispatched Dartmouth's Hany Farid to go la-la-la-I-can't-hear-you past the Backyard Photo graveyard, nose shadow add-on and all, the CIA presents the cartoon of TWA Flight 800 which ignores the missile seen by a hundred or more, the evidence of explosive residue, etcetera.
Surely Ptolemy can prove circular orbits with a few more epicycles.
Give Langley just one more "documentary" on a Mockingbird channel with yet one more shrieking fairy or carping harpy of the Confusatorium.