Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
How Demolition Charges Were Placed in WTC 1 AND 2: A Hypothesis
#9
And this little nugget:

"If the World Trade Center towers were brought down with explosives, which is the only reasonable explanation for what the world witnessed, then a considerable amount of advance work would have had to be done. Such an operation presumably would have had to be run through the WTC's security service, since that is the entity given unrestricted access to the buildings, and, of equal importance, the entity with the authority to restrict the access of others."

"A business entity now known as Stratesec, Inc. began performing security work at the World Trade Center in 1993. In 1996, the company, then known as Securacom, was awarded an exclusive contract to provide security for the World Trade Center complex. Stratesec/Securacom also provided security for United Airlines and Dulles International Airport, two other key players in the 9-11 story. Sitting on Stratesec's board of directors, from the time the company began working at the WTC, was a major shareholder by the name of Marvin Bush. Marvin, like Jeb and Neil, is a brother of George W. Bush. Small world, isn't it?"

Charles Drago Wrote:
James Lewis Wrote:Also, Charles, remember that:

1) All three buildings (WTC 1, 2, and 7) had been evacuated twice, floor by floor, in June and July of 2001, and:

2) Anyone with access to the elevator shafts would have been able to plant demolition charges in all three buildings.

I do remember.

And I would expand upon your second point: "[They] would have been able to plant demolition charges [and/or update, modify, and examine the condition of existing] demolition charges [and systems] in all three buildings."
"Logic is all there is, and all there is must be logical."

"Truth is logic, and logic is truth."

"In a nation run by swine, all pigs are upward-mobile and the rest of us are fucked until we can put our acts together: not necessarily to win, but mainly to keep from losing completely." - Hunter S. Thompson

"A paranoid is someone who knows a little of what's going on. A psychotic is a guy who's just found out what's going on." - William S. Burroughs
Reply


Messages In This Thread
How Demolition Charges Were Placed in WTC 1 AND 2: A Hypothesis - by James Lewis - 14-08-2011, 10:08 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Niederhut And Controlled Demolition Brian Doyle 2 1,560 18-12-2024, 06:06 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  NEW Proof of Controlled Demolition of WTC-7 Peter Lemkin 6 9,039 19-04-2020, 05:27 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Seismic Evidence of Controlled Demolition of WTC Towers [all three] Peter Lemkin 0 5,470 12-01-2018, 09:59 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  European Scientific Journal Concludes 9/11 a Controlled Demolition David Guyatt 5 16,701 22-02-2017, 11:39 PM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  Demolition Access to the WTC Towers Peter Lemkin 1 12,792 29-02-2016, 09:53 PM
Last Post: R.K. Locke
  New Detailed Analysis of WTC 7 Controlled Demolition Peter Lemkin 0 6,254 01-12-2015, 04:42 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Dutch Demolition Expert ID's WTC-7 as Controlled Demo...then is killed in accident. Peter Lemkin 7 22,464 20-09-2015, 07:42 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Demolition Access To The WTC Towers - Kevin Ryan Peter Lemkin 81 71,105 18-04-2014, 12:51 PM
Last Post: Drew Phipps
  World Trade Center Buildings (and Others?) Pre-Rigged for Controlled Demolition: A Hypothesis Charles Drago 42 31,645 26-03-2013, 07:07 PM
Last Post: Jeffrey Orling
  New Seismic Analysis Further Points to Controlled Demolition.... Peter Lemkin 0 4,439 03-12-2012, 05:21 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)