15-06-2011, 11:10 PM
[/QUOTE] And I assume Zirbel has no knowledge of Gladio.
My sense is that Farrell accepted the writing commission from Childress then found specific areas that interested him far more than Zirbel's hypothesis.
The result is not a Bouillabaisse, but rather a dog's dinner...[/QUOTE]
Correct with Gladio. Zirbel wouldn't have a clue. Yeah the reasons why Farrell did as he did were kind of explained by him by John Simkin. Not a Bouilabaisse. Lol it sounds yum never heard of it mate. But I disagree with the dogs dinner by a degree Jan. Farrells book is the other end of the 'dogs dinner' the one you stand in while he wags tail.
Yes I've seen some of there stuff lol RE Anton Wilson and co. Havent been impressed. Remind me of Hoffman egads! Speaking of the three named Kooks. I've actually had a few people email me about Peter Dale Scott. It's funny theres some useful stuff that Dale Scott has but sadly he gets very convoluted very quickly and he seems to buy into the 'Deep Political' angle and layers yet acknowledges all the false sponsors that Evica names. In that regard I much prefer Evica. He gets a little complex on it-arguably needlessly so. But ultimately he doesn't piss about when he makes a call and I find GME to be far more solid not kooky at all.
PDS seems to cut his cloth to suit his fit. His earlier stuff was quite okay. But no generally speaking Im not a great adherent and I am unsure of his motives truth be told.
My sense is that Farrell accepted the writing commission from Childress then found specific areas that interested him far more than Zirbel's hypothesis.
The result is not a Bouillabaisse, but rather a dog's dinner...[/QUOTE]
Correct with Gladio. Zirbel wouldn't have a clue. Yeah the reasons why Farrell did as he did were kind of explained by him by John Simkin. Not a Bouilabaisse. Lol it sounds yum never heard of it mate. But I disagree with the dogs dinner by a degree Jan. Farrells book is the other end of the 'dogs dinner' the one you stand in while he wags tail.
Yes I've seen some of there stuff lol RE Anton Wilson and co. Havent been impressed. Remind me of Hoffman egads! Speaking of the three named Kooks. I've actually had a few people email me about Peter Dale Scott. It's funny theres some useful stuff that Dale Scott has but sadly he gets very convoluted very quickly and he seems to buy into the 'Deep Political' angle and layers yet acknowledges all the false sponsors that Evica names. In that regard I much prefer Evica. He gets a little complex on it-arguably needlessly so. But ultimately he doesn't piss about when he makes a call and I find GME to be far more solid not kooky at all.
PDS seems to cut his cloth to suit his fit. His earlier stuff was quite okay. But no generally speaking Im not a great adherent and I am unsure of his motives truth be told.
"In the Kennedy assassination we must be careful of running off into the ether of our own imaginations." Carl Ogelsby circa 1992