01-06-2011, 02:38 AM
Kyle Burnett Wrote:Ed Jewett Wrote:Like many aspects of 9/11 (and other controversies), there are "camps" or groupings of people who are in one school of thought or another on some piece of minutiae.Sure, and given your apparent lack of interest in discussing the supposed evidence of video fakery; I take it you are in the camp that enjoys promoting any argument against the official story regardless of whether or not it stands up to scrutiny. eh?
Oh, I love it when I get analyzed from a distance. Who are you? What possibly could you know about me and my experience, education, or background, or what superbly insightful skills in your own quiver of tools allows you to jump to those conclusions? My apparent lack of interest might stem from the fact that I have other issues on my plate so I don't have the time to argue the minutiae or whether "the argument stands up to scrutiny". From what I understand of the software available in the medium today, it is plausible, but I post most things here so that they may be scrutinized by a wider variety of people with different expertise in a way that might allow some clarity to emerge.
From where I sit (going back five decades) the official stories of the US government haven't been able to withstand more than about two weeks worth of scrutiny, and here were are almost a decade (and how many lives?) away from the event in question. If you are asking if my mind is made up that the official story is a pile of hogwash, then you can put me down for a "yes". If you ask me to forward my best theory as to how things actually went down, I note only that many are here still debating the angle and trajectory of shots fired 17,357 days ago (47 years, 6 months, 9 days).
"Where is the intersection between the world's deep hunger and your deep gladness?"