05-02-2011, 07:58 AM
In my opinion, there are several "deep" layers interwoven into this speech.
Although I agree that it can be interpreted as nothing more than a Cold Warrior's appeal to the sensibilities of the press, it is much more than merely that, IMO. I even believe that JFK was correct in making such a speech, even if only for that one reason, namely, protecting National Security.
However, that is a minimalistic interpretation and is lacking in historic context. The "entity" that he is describing is not limited by political ideology, by nationality, by allegiance, nor by religious fervor. It is not limited to communists, fascists, capitalists, Christians, Muslims, or Jews.
His description of the "unspeakable" fits the bill perfectly. Whether or not he meant to convey this interpretation of his words is unknown. However, it seems to be a HUGE stretch to imagine that he did not.
Although I agree that it can be interpreted as nothing more than a Cold Warrior's appeal to the sensibilities of the press, it is much more than merely that, IMO. I even believe that JFK was correct in making such a speech, even if only for that one reason, namely, protecting National Security.
However, that is a minimalistic interpretation and is lacking in historic context. The "entity" that he is describing is not limited by political ideology, by nationality, by allegiance, nor by religious fervor. It is not limited to communists, fascists, capitalists, Christians, Muslims, or Jews.
His description of the "unspeakable" fits the bill perfectly. Whether or not he meant to convey this interpretation of his words is unknown. However, it seems to be a HUGE stretch to imagine that he did not.
GO_SECURE
monk
"It is difficult to abolish prejudice in those bereft of ideas. The more hatred is superficial, the more it runs deep."
James Hepburn -- Farewell America (1968)
monk
"It is difficult to abolish prejudice in those bereft of ideas. The more hatred is superficial, the more it runs deep."
James Hepburn -- Farewell America (1968)