30-01-2011, 03:45 PM
Jack White Wrote:Charles Drago Wrote:Again, I ask one and all to consider a third alternative.
Namely: If not in the "Conein" instance, the photographic record may have been altered to indicate the presence of Facilitators -- real and false -- at the scenes of these crimes.
The only Facilitators I know to have been in Dealey Plaza during the attack on JFK are Lyndon Baines Johnson and certain Secret Service agents whose identities I cannot state with equal certitude.
My educated guess is that others likely were present. But (with the exception of those indicated above) I have yet to see a photo that I can accept as containing a genuine image of an assassination Facilitator -- or, for that matter, Sponsor -- on site during and/or immediately pre- or post-shooting.
Thanks, Charles, for again bringing up the overwhelming likelihood
that MANY photos of DP activities are PROVABLY ALTERED. It may
even be possible, as you say, that photos were altered to insert
doppelgangers of various persons into pictures for reasons we can
only guess at. Many doubt the possibility of such altered photos...
BUT SUCH ALTERATIONS HAVE BEEN PROVED OVER AND OVER. Why
should this one photo be an exception? It is even doubtful, based on
facts and Altgens' testimony, that he made exposures 5, 7 and 8.
I say this issue remains a mystery, and that it is not as cut and
dried as some think.
Jack
Did someone insert the a photograph of Lucien Conein to make people think that Robert Adams was there, or did someone insert a picture of Robert Adams to make people think that Lucien Conein was there?
Rod Serling would love this.

