Who’s telling the truth: Clint Hill or the Zapruder film?

[James H. Fetzer]

Have you taken a good look at the medical evidence? JFK was hit four times--once in the throat from in front, once in the back from behind, and twice in the head from behind and from in front. There appear to have been shooters at six locations and, given four hits on JFK, one to three on Connally, and at least three misses, there were eight, nine, or ten shots altogether. You might want to take a look at a piece of mine which I presented at the University of North Dakota, where I was introduced by Judge John Tunheim, who was the chair of the ARRB. My goal was to provide an integration of what we know about the physical, medical, ballistic and photographic evidence. Then share your thoughts with me:

Dealey Plaza Revisited: What Happened to JFK?
http://www.und.edu/instruct/jfkconferenc...pter30.pdf

I know of no one who thinks any photographs or films were faked in advance. I can't imagine why anyone would even think it were possible. The conspirators would not have known what they needed to cover-up before the assassination had even taken place. The prospect of a blow-out to the back of the head from a shot fired from the back of the head is quite remote. We know that his brains were blown out to the left rear, where they hit Officer Hargis, who was riding at the left rear of the limousine, so hard he thought he himself had been shot. This is not really "my theory" but the result of collaborative research with David Mantik, John Costella, Charles Crenshaw, Jack White, David Healy, and David Lifton.