03-01-2011, 10:25 PM
The very idea that Lyndon had to be controlling Oswald in New Orleans, Mexico
City (if he went there), or even in Dallas to qualify as the "mastermind" boggles
the mind. I have already exposed this shallow form of chicanery. That CHARLES
DRAGO would side with JIM DIEUGENIO in a stunning example of flawed reasoning
is beyond belief. I used to hold at least one of them in high esteem. But persevering
in defense of the indefensible is taking a heavy toll upon my enthusiasm. If there
has ever been a more feeble argument against Lyndon's pivotal role, I can't imagine
what it would be. That Charles aligns himself with such obvious rubbish is pathetic.
City (if he went there), or even in Dallas to qualify as the "mastermind" boggles
the mind. I have already exposed this shallow form of chicanery. That CHARLES
DRAGO would side with JIM DIEUGENIO in a stunning example of flawed reasoning
is beyond belief. I used to hold at least one of them in high esteem. But persevering
in defense of the indefensible is taking a heavy toll upon my enthusiasm. If there
has ever been a more feeble argument against Lyndon's pivotal role, I can't imagine
what it would be. That Charles aligns himself with such obvious rubbish is pathetic.
Charles Drago Wrote:I am convinced.
It is so because James Fetzer says it is so.
Johnson was all over New Orleans in the months leading up to the assassination. He had beignets with Bannister, sex with Shaw, ratatouille with Russo, fried fish with Ferrie, bratwurst with Bringuierr, and all the while hand-held the patsy-to-be through every stage of the sheep-dipping which he had planned, between psychotic episodes, over the previous four years.
LBJ, the Big Sleazy, ran the show in the Big Easy! And don't give me any "There isn't a shard of evidence to support such a ludicrous claim!" bullshit.
It is so because James Fetzer says it is so.