Fetzer/Burton Moon Landing Debate Finale

[Peter Dawson]

The sentence said, "If that is true", not that "It is true". And if it were true, then
I can imagine no other reason that the one I have advanced. Your understanding
of logic appears to be no more substantial than your understanding of the moon hoax.
Given everything else we know about it--including (8), (9), and (10), where you
haven't a clue--it is far more probable that the image you linked was fabricated
rather than real, which is very easy to do with digital technology. That has to be the
reason they"lost" the moon landing tapes, Peter: so they could redo them better!
I know it lies beyond the scope of your imagination to contemplate it, but the weight
of the evidence, I am sorry to say, suggests that men have never gone to the moon.

As I said earlier in response to your questions, what you fail to take into account is the fact that it's not simply television images which would have to be faked, but all sorts of data collected from the missions, so that even if absolutely all original sources of Apollo data had since gone missing, the actual values of the data, recorded in countless secondary sources, sit with us for all time and are open to falsification by any and every later collection of data taken from the moon.

Data collected from the moon would be unique to the moon, and if they made that data up for the Apollo missions, they couldn't possibly have guesstimated perfectly accurate data in each and every case.

So Professor Fetzer, your theory finds itself with a little insurmountable problem - there is a dog that didn't bark, that should have barked by now if your theory had any truth to it: Scientists from all over the world should long ago have started to notice discrepancies between their freshly collected data from the moon, and the data recorded from the Apollo missions, yet this has not occurred.