21-11-2010, 04:14 PM
David Guyatt Wrote:Rather than in continuing to engage in Ad Hominem attacks on Jim Fetzer, Perhaps you can make use of the reconstituted EF thread that Magda posted and build a factual case to support your arguments? I think this would be viewed all round as the best way to proceed is you are to sway people to your point of view.
David,
Mr. Dawson's posts are provoking acid flashbacks -- and a fair amount of acid reflux.
He entered this fray at post 18 with the following example of -- forgive me, but I must -- "Colby"-esque eloquence:
"You are a sorry old sack of shit, Fetzer."
Since then Mr. Dawson has labored to establish his agnostic credentials in a more friendly fashion, only to let the cat out of the bag with ever-intensifying expressions of his anti-hoax position.
In the process, Mr. Dawson has attempted -- all too successfully, I'm afraid -- to infiltrate into this forum a certain Burton, one of the most obvious and ham-handed disinformationalists from the EF.
I might add that Mr. Dawson and that EF enemy agent are distant neighbors.
Not that there's anything wrong with it, to wax Seinfeldian for a moment.
Mr. Dawson's conjoined attacks on Jim Fetzer and Jack White are highly suspicious insofar as they mimic near-identical tactics repeatedly used by EF headhunters.
Wide disparities of language and usage evidenced in Mr. Dawson's posts put one in mind of the "Colby" posts' fatal (to his masters' game) variations, although I'm not quite ready to enclose the former's name in quotation marks (or inverted commas, if you prefer).
Mr. Dawson attempts to establish his conspiracy-supporting, deep political bona fides by regularly reiterating his belief in a JFK conspiracy. This too is an old disinformation tactic, one which "Colby" utilized for years.
Hmmm ... If it sounds like a fart, and stinks like a fart ...
As for the central issue at hand: I remain up in the air (intentional) regarding the alleged moon hoax. If forced at gunpoint to address the question, "Were the moon landings faked or real?", I would offer a one-word answer.
"Yes."
Charles
Charles Drago
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene