15-11-2010, 06:52 AM
(This post was last modified: 15-11-2010, 07:06 AM by James H. Fetzer.)
Why don't you quote more of the paragraph, which makes my point obvious? I response like yours makes no sense for anyone who reads what I wrote, as presumably you have done:
Jack has done so much good work and the thread has run so long that I hope Dawson will concentrate on the arguments that have already been presented. There are, of course, many more.
Incidentally, you would think that, in framing the patsy for JFK, they would give a lot of thought to the weapon they planted on him. But the one they used cannot have fired the bullets that killed JFK.
You would think they would make sure their patsy was in the right place at the right time. But Oswald was observed in and around the lunchroom at 11:50 AM, at Noon, at 12:15 PM and as late as 12:25 PM by coworkers.
And within 90 secs, he was confronted by a motorcycle officer who held him in his sights until Roy Truly, his supervisor, explained that he worked there. And Marina would later observed that Lee admired JFK.
So the man the Warren Commission fingered for the crime had neither the means, the motive, or the opportunity to have killed him. So much for your style of reasoning about these things. I hope you can do better!
Jack has done so much good work and the thread has run so long that I hope Dawson will concentrate on the arguments that have already been presented. There are, of course, many more.
Incidentally, you would think that, in framing the patsy for JFK, they would give a lot of thought to the weapon they planted on him. But the one they used cannot have fired the bullets that killed JFK.
You would think they would make sure their patsy was in the right place at the right time. But Oswald was observed in and around the lunchroom at 11:50 AM, at Noon, at 12:15 PM and as late as 12:25 PM by coworkers.
And within 90 secs, he was confronted by a motorcycle officer who held him in his sights until Roy Truly, his supervisor, explained that he worked there. And Marina would later observed that Lee admired JFK.
So the man the Warren Commission fingered for the crime had neither the means, the motive, or the opportunity to have killed him. So much for your style of reasoning about these things. I hope you can do better!
Peter Dawson Wrote:James H. Fetzer Wrote:Jack has done so much good work and the thread has run so long that I hope Dawson will concentrate on the arguments that have already been presented.
Why don't you concentrate on the arguments that have already been presented? You make a post which apparently is in response to a post I made, yet the only connection you make to the material I discuss in my post is to repeat the furphy that the astronauts had to endure temperatures 250 degrees below zero.
Why do you "hope Dawson will concentrate on the arguments that have already been presented" and then proceed to present a long list of entirely unreferenced claims about the moon missions?