The Lyndon Johnson-Nelson Rockefeller Connection to the JFK Assassination

[Dawn Meredith]

More precisely, the incredible anger that the CIA, anti-Castro Cubans and mafia had towards John Kennedy for 1) the Bay of Pigs fiasco which they blamed on him 2) not invading or bombinb (wisely) Cuba during Cuban Missile Crisis 3) and fear that Kennedy was on track to normalize relations with Cuba leaving Castro intact.

This paragraph neatly presents nothing more than the on-the-record motives of two of the False Sponsor groups of the Kennedy hit.

So sure, foreign policy had a big role in the JFK assassination.

However, it is counter-productive at best and perhaps even disengenuous to imply that the "foreign policy"-related motivations of the true Sponsors of JFK's murder included the wish to remove the communist government of Cuba. In point of fact, the long-term survival of that government was then -- and remains to this day -- a key component in the preservation of hemispheric threat as a justification for military expenditures and a cover for assorted deep political operations.

But the key point of my post is the Lyndon Johnson/Nelson Rockefeller connection - I think they were BOTH engaged in the planning and COVER UP of the JFK assassination.

The problem with the "Johnson/Nelson Rockefeller" construction is that it quite literally places at the same level of the JFK conspiracy players who could not have been more distanced from each other in terms of their roles and influence in that crime.

Lyndon Johnson was both a False Sponsor and a Facilitator of the assassination. He no more ordered and "planned" the hit than he created the horse and designed the saddle he rode in on.




No, Mr. Morrow, I am not "like you." Johnson had no business -- literally and in the colloquial sense -- at the Sponsorship level of the conspiracy. He was powerless to order/sponsor the assassination, and he was powerless to save himself from being incriminated as a False Sponsor of the assassination.

What Lyndon Johnson "wanted" was of absolutely no consequence whatsoever to the Sponsors of JFK's murder.

Johnson's role was to effectuate the cover-up and otherwise do as he was told. Or else.

And so, Mr. Morrow, I must interpret your posts as quoted here and appearing elsewhere as disinformation of a very high order.

Your placement of this line

WHO Lyndon Johnson wanted to replace himself with as President in 1968.[emphasis added]

buried within a larger paragraph that begins with a cleverly disguised argument from false authority

If you are like me, and you think Lyndon Johnson was at the ground zero CENTER of the JFK assassination[emphasis added]

speaks to the nature and the sophistication of your game.

[Many can kill a president, but FEW can control the machinery of government to guarantee a successful cover up, and that is what happened in this case.

Clearly, it's still happening.

CD: Whoa. Just because Robert sincerely believes LBJ was high up on the list of sponsers does not make him a disinformation agent. He is here to learn, he is fairly new to the study of JFK and has been diligently reading books for a few years now. Not everyone is a disinformation agent because they differ with some of the views here. To refer to "the sophistication of (your) game" is quite out of line. Robert's only "game" is the truth. He is eager to learn and if he makes errors, they are sincere, I can assure you it is not a game.
Dawn