29-05-2010, 07:46 PM
Bldg 7 would make an excellent band name or album title.
How much thermate would one need to turn those buildings into fine dust? Obviously there was an extreme thermal event that wasted metal away. There seem to have been magnetic anomalies as well. Not having invested in any one version of 9/11 "Truth"--the coverage that day looked like a demolition job to me at the time--I'm curious if the real mechanism has been guessed yet. It looks like a nuclear event, but I've never heard of radioisotopes being discovered. Fuel-air doesn't work because of the control exhibited. Directed-energy weapons make sense in a way for the two big towers, bldg 7 could be a straight demolition job with conventionals, and I like Griffin's take the job was botched.
"Asbestos abatement" hasn't yet led to any smoking guns, although that's the most obvious cover for introducing something like thermate, but it has been mentioned as a reason for "pulling" the buildings, because the costs would've been so high it was easier to just torch them and get (double) the insurance.
"Art students" are interesting as a factor. One thing came to mind reading Griffin's piece: they must've produced better films of the demolition in progress, perhaps even "wall-cams" with autonomous power supplies using low-power radio transmission before destruction. Such trophies must exist, if only as proof-of-concept footage kept in a secure location or locations.
How much thermate would one need to turn those buildings into fine dust? Obviously there was an extreme thermal event that wasted metal away. There seem to have been magnetic anomalies as well. Not having invested in any one version of 9/11 "Truth"--the coverage that day looked like a demolition job to me at the time--I'm curious if the real mechanism has been guessed yet. It looks like a nuclear event, but I've never heard of radioisotopes being discovered. Fuel-air doesn't work because of the control exhibited. Directed-energy weapons make sense in a way for the two big towers, bldg 7 could be a straight demolition job with conventionals, and I like Griffin's take the job was botched.
"Asbestos abatement" hasn't yet led to any smoking guns, although that's the most obvious cover for introducing something like thermate, but it has been mentioned as a reason for "pulling" the buildings, because the costs would've been so high it was easier to just torch them and get (double) the insurance.
"Art students" are interesting as a factor. One thing came to mind reading Griffin's piece: they must've produced better films of the demolition in progress, perhaps even "wall-cams" with autonomous power supplies using low-power radio transmission before destruction. Such trophies must exist, if only as proof-of-concept footage kept in a secure location or locations.